Metapraxis / a working framework
A grammar for how we know & work.
Turn experience into something another person can build with. Connect the principles behind the work, test what becomes possible, and bring the learning back.
Short version below · Full framework and research inside
Components · methods · checks
Distill knowledge. Collect real work and curate its principles, evidence, assumptions, and limits. A useful module does not need to capture a whole person.
The short version
Not a master brain.
A way to work together.
- 01
Knowledge brain
A bounded contribution from real practice: artifacts, principles, methods, examples, and known limits. Not a replica of a person.
- 02
Metapraxis
The grammar that makes those components and processes explicit. It documents how they relate, what they assume, and how to check their use.
- 03
Brain Flywheel
The participatory cycle that connects this knowledge, applies it, and returns better methods, relationships, and potentially agreed economic value.
Not just A + B.
Something new.
“Link brain” is more than a friend request or shared folder. Connect the principles behind the work, and preserve the reasoning that makes the combination useful.
A · Knowledge
A method, its context,
and evidence.
B · Knowledge
Another discipline,
with its own assumptions.
Knowledge record
What connects. Why it works.
What changes. What was tested.
Combine · apply · test
C · A new capability.
More than the sum of the parts.
A new tool, method, or way of seeing that neither contribution could create alone. Not just a collection of A and B, but something made possible by their connection.
Return the new knowledge to A and B, so the next turn starts further ahead. This is the aim, not a guaranteed result: a failed transfer can also reveal a useful limit.
The integrated framework
Knowledge has limits.
Experience compounds.
- 01
Know the frontier
Bring each discipline’s strongest supported methods. Show the known gaps, open issues, and untested possibilities alongside what already works.
- 02
Experience compounds
A useful result should improve the next attempt. Return better methods, evidence, and relationships, so the cycle becomes an upward spiral rather than repetition.
- 03
Value has a context
Useful to whom, for what task, with which complementary tools? Truth, usefulness, price, and permission are different questions.
- 04
Keep practice honest
Does the system reward what it claims to value? Does a polished graph imply unwarranted authority? Is collecting being confused with learning?
- 05
Collaborate transparently
Make contributions, assumptions, credit, permissions, and any returns explicit. People should be able to contribute, disagree, receive credit, and leave.
Together, expand what is possible. The ambition is to remove avoidable barriers, not every limit. These design questions integrate the Austrian economics and Žižek research without claiming the traditions agree; the full framework includes sources and boundaries.
Read / the framework
From principles to a working grammar
Follow the full argument: codification, cross-domain transfer, ideology, ownership, philosophical analogies, and a bounded first test.
Read the long version ↗Investigate / the backlog
Questions, not endorsements
Twelve prioritized inquiries into Austrian economics, Žižek, and the practical conditions that could keep the flywheel turning.
Explore the research ↗